Skip to main content

Assessment of the accuracy of continuous cardiac output and pulse contour cardiac output in tracking cardiac index changes induced by volume load

Journal article with Commission authors.

Authors:

Boyle M, Murgo, M, Lawrence J, Belessis A, & Shehabi Y

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2007.05.003

Summary

Objective

To assess the ability to track changes in cardiac index (ΔCI) induced by volume loading using continuous pulsed heat thermodilution (CCO), and pulse contour (PCCO) cardiac output (CO) with transpulmonary thermodilution (TDtp) CO as reference.

Design

Prospective observational clinical trial.

Setting

Intensive care unit.

Patients

Twelve ventilated and sedated post-operative cardiac surgery patients.

Measurements and results

Each patient had a 7.5F CCO pulmonary artery catheter (Edwards Lifesciences) and a 5F, 20 cm PCCO femoral artery catheter (Pulsion Medical Systems). Forty-five data sets were taken before and after 25 volume loadings of 5 mL/kg of 4% albumin.

Volume loading resulted in an increase in CI (2.84 L/(min m2) versus 3.12 L/(min m2), p < .05) although only nine volume loadings changed CI (ΔCI) ≥ 14%. The change in CI using PCCO (ΔPCCI) was correlated with ΔCI (TDtp) (R2 = .50, p < .0001), whilst ΔCI using CCO (ΔCCI) was not (R2 = .14). The bias and limits of agreement (LOA) between ΔTDtpCI and ΔPCCI was 6.2% (95% CI, ±5.8%) and 28.4% (95% CI, ±38.2%) respectively. ΔTDtpCI and ΔCCI has a bias of 2.6% (95% CI, ±8.3%) and LOA of 39.6% (95% CI, ±63%). Both ΔPCCI and ΔCCI reliably tracked ΔCI ≥ 14%.

Conclusion

In this small group of patients the continuous cardiac output methods tracked changes in CI, although, in individual cases they did not change in the same direction as the thermodilution method. Critical care nurses need to critically appraise the accuracy and clinical relevance of continuous CO data within the clinical context.

Back to top