Skip to main content
Antimicrobial stewardship
Medicines

Find out how Safer Care Victoria implemented antibiotic allergy de-labelling services in 11 health services across the state. Guidance and support from Safer Care Victoria was key to the success. 

To view the summarised case study, you can skip to At a glance.


Step 1. Select priority areas
Step 1. Select priority areas

Allergy labels – a common reason for inappropriate antibiotic prescribing

Antibiotic allergy de-labelling has become a focus of international antimicrobial stewardship programs. In Australia, over two million people report an antibiotic allergy, with one in ten in hospitals reporting an allergy to penicillin. As many as 85% of these allergies can be safely tested and de-labelled.3 As outlined in the Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard, antibiotic allergies should be accurately assessed and documented to allow for optimal antimicrobial prescribing. It is known that patients labelled with a penicillin allergy have increased prevalence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and have longer hospital stays.1 Inaccurate penicillin allergy labels have been associated with increased use of broad-spectrum antibiotic use and inappropriate prescribing.2 Due to the success of the Better Care Victoria project that implemented an inpatient antibiotic allergy assessment and de-labelling service at Austin Health and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Safer Care Victoria chose to expand the project to other health services in the state. 

Step 2. Plan the project
Step 2. Plan the project

Following a successful allergy de-labelling program

A change package was developed to support other Victorian health services with the roll out of an inpatient penicillin allergy assessment and de-labelling program. 

The core activities undertaken during the planning phase of this project included:  

  1. Encouraging health services to collect four weeks of baseline data prior to the project commencement
  2. Implementing process mapping to identify key stakeholders for engagement and to determine stages in the patient’s journey where penicillin allergies could be identified, assessed and de-labelled
  3. Establishing governance structures and stakeholder engagement mechanisms to enable project success
  4. Development of local guidelines, including inclusion criteria for penicillin allergy testing
  5. Education for clinicians. 
Step 3. Measure and review
Step 3. Measure and review

Drilling down into the data

At the time, limited support and services were available to de-label low risk penicillin allergies in other health services in Victoria. 

Key measures for the project included percentage of patients with:

  • No risk of a true penicillin allergy that have their allergy directly de-labelled
  • Low risk of a true penicillin allergy that have their allergy de-labelled following an oral challenge
  • A documented penicillin allergy in the medical record with the active ingredient, the date of the reaction, its nature and severity specified.
Step 4. Explore reasons
Step 4. Explore reasons

Looking for underlying causes

Safer Care Victoria found the following barriers in implementing allergy de-labelling services in Victorian hospitals: 

  • Varying levels of clinician knowledge about penicillin allergy labels 
  • Lack of expertise and confidence in implementing a penicillin allergy de-labelling service 
  • Low priority to assess antibiotic allergies
  • Overreporting of penicillin allergies by patients due to experiencing a side effect to a penicillin, childhood reactions, family history, miscommunication and overcaution. 
Step 5. Act to improve
Step 5. Act to improve

Develop, test and adapt

Safer Care Victoria collaborated with health services to use the Model for Improvement to implement penicillin allergy de-labelling at 12 health facilities including rural, regional and metropolitan hospitals. Safer Care Victoria ran three in-person learning sessions and three health service-based action periods, where changes were tested and adapted. The participating sites maintained contact with each other and Safer Care Victoria, and regularly shared wins, challenges and learnings.

Step 6. Monitor and report
Step 6. Monitor and report

Looking at the impact

Of the 12 sites, 11 have implemented a guideline to conduct inpatient penicillin de-labelling.

The program has: 

  • Achieved a 25% increase in access to comprehensive allergy assessment for hospitalised patients 
  • Developed a toolkit to share learnings. 

System benefits:
Safer Care Victoria is partnering with the international Network of Antibiotic Allergy Nations (iNAAN) to form the Check Again Network. The Check Again Network will scale and spread the work of the Collaborative to additional Victorian sites and create the opportunity for services to share wins, challenges, and learnings. 

At a glance

Issues
  • High rates of inappropriate penicillin allergy labels
  • High rates of broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing
Barriers
  • Lack of knowledge and confidence to implement a penicillin allergy de-labelling program
  • Penicillin allergy de-labelling is not well-established in antimicrobial stewardship practice
Enablers
  • Collaboration with Austin Health to leverage their successful implementation of allergy de-labelling 
  • Support from Safer Care Victoria for educational sessions and guidance on implementation
Solutions
  • Change package which included a guidance document on how to implement the allergy service
  • Educational sessions to collaborate and learn from other health services on the barriers and enablers on establishing a successful program

More Case Studies

View more case studies that showcase best practice in the review of clinical variation.

Do you have a case study to contribute?
We will work with you to write the case study. Please contact us on Atlas@safetyandquality.gov.au

View all case studies of clinical variation in health case

Browse latest case studies

Back to top